U.S. House — WI-03
H4WI03169When the regulator and the regulated share the same donors, you deserve to know.
Less than $1 / week · Cancel anytime
Voting records are public. Most people never look. Now you can.
Less than $1 / week · Cancel anytime
Some members of Congress made millions trading on what they knew. This shows you if yours did.
Less than $1 / week · Cancel anytime
The donors already know what they expect. Shouldn't you?
Less than $1 / week · Cancel anytime
See exactly who — and what they're spending to get in return.
Less than $1 / week · Cancel anytime
Most voters never see this list. Now you can.
Less than $1 / week · Cancel anytime
Based on FEC disclosures, STOCK Act filings & congressional record · Nonpartisan
0% from corporations & PACs
Mostly individuals
100% of total money is outside/Super PAC
$1.8M in Super PAC support
No committee/donor overlaps
Clean
Trade data not yet available
Check FEC.gov
Congressional record not yet indexed
See congress.gov
This measures what share of direct campaign donations came from corporations and PACs versus individual citizens. Higher corporate concentration means special interests have more access — and more leverage.
Independent expenditures (Super PAC spending) don't show up in a candidate's own fundraising — but they're still spent to elect them. High outside money means anonymous donors are bankrolling the campaign without any disclosure of who they are or what they want.
A conflict of interest exists when a lawmaker sits on a committee that regulates the same industry that funds their campaign. When the regulator and the regulated are financially connected, voters should ask: whose interests come first?
STOCK Act trading disclosures are required by law but our data feed for this member is still being indexed. Check the full record directly at FEC.gov or congress.gov financial disclosures.
This candidate's legislative record is not tracked in congressional databases, likely because they sought or served in executive office rather than Congress.