U.S. Senate — DE
S0DE00092Based on FEC disclosures, STOCK Act filings & congressional record · Nonpartisan
98% from corporations & PACs
$437K corporate
100% of total money is outside/Super PAC
$1K in Super PAC support
No committee/donor overlaps detected
Clean
No stock trades on record
Clean
No congressional record found
Presidential / no data
This measures what share of direct campaign donations came from corporations and PACs versus individual citizens. Higher corporate concentration means special interests have more access — and more leverage.
Independent expenditures (Super PAC spending) don't show up in a candidate's own fundraising — but they're still spent to elect them. High outside money means anonymous donors are bankrolling the campaign without any disclosure of who they are or what they want.
A conflict of interest exists when a lawmaker sits on a committee that regulates the same industry that funds their campaign. When the regulator and the regulated are financially connected, voters should ask: whose interests come first?
Under the STOCK Act, members of Congress must publicly report all personal stock trades within 45 days. No disclosed trades were found for this member.
This candidate's legislative record is not tracked in congressional databases, likely because they sought or served in executive office rather than Congress.
No financial totals available.
Where campaign dollars actually come from, by sector
Includes individual supporters, small businesses, and donors not easily categorized by industry.
⚠ Industries exceeding 20% of total funding may indicate concentrated special-interest influence on this candidate.
Committees and organizations that donated directly to the campaign
Top donors to the principal campaign committee
Publicly disclosed FEC filings showing AIPAC-affiliated political spending
AIPAC is one of the most active political lobbying organizations in the US. These figures reflect publicly disclosed FEC filings.
Source: FEC Open Data API · Updated within 48 hours of filing
Outside groups that spent the most to support this candidate, and who funded them
What they want: Planned Parenthood's political arm spends to elect candidates who will protect abortion access and keep federal funding for reproductive healthcare.
What they want: Environmental groups spending to elect candidates who back clean energy policy, climate action, EPA regulations, and protecting public lands from development.
Dark money is legal in U.S. elections. Organizations classified as 501(c)(4) nonprofits can spend unlimited amounts on elections without disclosing their donors. TrueVote flags all known dark money activity and exposes every traceable connection — but some funding sources remain legally hidden.
This amount moved through organizations not required to disclose their donors. The ultimate source of this money cannot be confirmed from public records.
Outside groups spending to support or oppose this candidate, uncoordinated with the campaign
Source: FEC Open Data API · Updated within 48 hours of filing